Skip to main content
Oldest & Best Manuscript Evidence Database

Revelation 16:5

Which Art, and Wast, and Shalt Be

KJV Reading Defended

And I heard the angel of the waters say, Thou art righteous, O Lord, which art, and wast, and shalt be, because thou hast judged thus.

Why the KJV Reading Is Retained

The KJV preserves Revelation’s characteristic threefold divine title: the One who is, who was, and who is to come. That formula is securely established at Revelation 1:4, 1:8, and 4:8. Related future-tense wording is also preserved in the Ethiopic tradition and in Beatus’s Latin commentary, showing that the future element was not unknown outside the later printed Greek text. Beza introduced the Greek form into his 1582 edition, and it became the received reading behind the KJV.

Disputed unit

The complete title at word addresses 18-32, not separate isolated votes for ‘Lord’ and ‘shall be.’

Conjectural emendationNo Greek manuscript supportPrinted-text historyLatin evidenceDoctrinally discussed variantComplex evidence

Evidence assessment

ECM treats the title as one complex unit. None of its Greek manuscript entries reads either κύριε or ἐσόμενος. The 91 displayed Greek states, representing 90 physical artifacts, preserve several forms centered on ὅσιος.

Primary support for the KJV reading

Historical printed-text and manuscript-report evidence rather than extant Greek manuscript support

King James Bible reading

Revelation 16:5 in the King James Bible

And I heard the angel of the waters say, Thou art righteous, O Lord, which art, and wast, and shalt be, because thou hast judged thus.
Open in Research Desk

Evidence sources

Where the evidence on this page comes from.

Sources used for the witnesses, readings, dates, and notes on this page. Complete citations appear in the References section at the end of the page.

Governing apparatus and count scope

The current digital ECM Revelation apparatus. Counts are the named Greek reading states displayed for the exact target unit; fully non-extant witnesses remain separate.

Full witness information

Earliest KJV-supporting evidence

The earliest reviewed support at a glance.

Unit 1 — “O Lord”

Eighth century — Beatus of Liébana supplies related Latin commentary evidence; AD 1592 — the Clementine Vulgate contains the title.

Earliest surviving Greek support: No surviving Greek manuscript is presently identified for the added title.

Unit 2 — “and shalt be”

Eighth century — Beatus of Liébana, related Latin future-tense form. Exact printed Greek form: AD 1582 — Beza’s third edition.

Earliest surviving Greek support: No surviving Greek manuscript is presently identified; the earliest exact Greek evidence is Beza’s printed text of AD 1582.

Primary support for the KJV reading

Historical printed-text and manuscript-report evidence rather than extant Greek manuscript support

The sections below preserve each supporting, competing, and related record under its proper evidence type.

Source scope and denominator

The current digital ECM Revelation apparatus. Counts are the named Greek reading states displayed for the exact target unit; fully non-extant witnesses remain separate.

Greek support in the cited corpus

0 Greek manuscript entries for the exact KJV future form

Greek competing evidence in the cited corpus

91 Greek states / 90 physical artifacts across the ὅσιος and related forms

Principal competing witnesses named in the snapshot

  • P47
  • Codex Sinaiticus (01)
  • 025
  • 051

Evidence represented on this page

Greek manuscripts

No entry listed

Ancient versions

Represented

Church fathers

Represented

Printed editions

Represented

Complete source-scoped roster

Complete roster within the stated source scope.

This roster preserves every named or grouped state recovered in the governing sources, including exact readings, competing readings, corrections, related forms, lacunae, versions, and aggregate traditions. When Maj or Byz appears on the KJV side, it marks the numerically dominant Greek transmission at that unit. The green Majority Text card above supplies the best available passage-specific estimate. The grouped siglum is then retained so it is not mistaken for one individual manuscript.

Apparatus and roster scope

The current digital ECM Revelation apparatus. Counts are the named Greek reading states displayed for the exact target unit; fully non-extant witnesses remain separate.

Greek support in cited scope
0 Greek manuscript entries for the exact KJV future form
Greek competing evidence in cited scope
91 Greek states / 90 physical artifacts across the ὅσιος and related forms
Evidence classification
Historical printed-text and manuscript-report evidence rather than extant Greek manuscript support

Complete title at addresses 18-32

KJV/TR unit: κύριε εἶ ὁ ὢν καὶ ὁ ἦν καὶ ὁ ἐσόμενος

Exact KJV future form

Supports the KJV/TR form

No Greek manuscript entry.

κύριε εἶ ὁ ὢν καὶ ὁ ἦν καὶ ὁ ὅσιος

Related or qualified evidence

ECM question-mark row; no Greek witness listed.

εἶ ὁ ὢν καὶ ὁ ἦν ὁ ὅσιος

Competing reading

01 025 051 35 201 254 325 456 469 632 1637 1732 1872 1888 2056 2067 2073 2074 2076C 2077 2080 2081 2256 2286 2595 2672 2681 2723 2847r 2886 2917

εἶ ὁ ὢν καὶ ὃς ἦν ὁ ὅσιος

Competing reading

69 1852 2200

εἶ ὁ ὢν καὶ ὁ ἦν ὅσιος

Competing reading

02 04 250 367 498 620 808 1611 1854 2076* 2138 2845 2846 2921

εἶ ὁ ὢν καὶ ὃς ἦν ὅσιος

Competing reading

046 61 82 91 93 177 452 506 522 1424 1719 1734 1780 1795 1849 2048 2070

εἶ ὁ ὢν καὶ ὁ ἦν καὶ ὅσιος

Competing reading

911 2026 2028 2057 2436? 2582

εἶ ὁ ὢν καὶ ὁ ἦν καὶ ὁ ὅσιος

Competing reading

792 1006 1773 1828 2019 2037 2042r 2053 2350 2429 2432r 2814

εἶ ὁ ὢν καὶ ὃς ἦν καὶ ὅσιος

Competing reading

P47 2329

P47 is extant here and belongs in this row.

ἦν ὁ ὢν καὶ ὃς ἦν ὅσιος

Competing reading

141

ὁ ὢν καὶ ὁ ἦν ὁ ὁ ὅσιος

Competing reading

2344 2919r

ὁ ὢν καὶ ὁ ἦν ὅσιος

Competing reading

104

εἶ ὁ ὢν καὶ ὅσιος

Competing reading

2071

ὢν ὁ ὢν καὶ ὁ ἦν

Competing reading

2495

ECM row lf.

Fully non-extant

Non-directional evidence

P43 0163 218 2050 2351 2377 2924

Church Fathers and literary witnesses

Precisely located citations and additional names reported by the controlling apparatus are kept separate. An apparatus-level attribution is not presented as an independently verified exact quotation.

Beatus of Liébana

AD 701–800

Commentary on the Apocalypse, lemma/comment on Revelation 16:5

Supporting witnessCitation type: Close quotation

Latin qui fuisti et futurus es (“who were and will be”)

Locator: Palmer

Open source

Roster distinctions

  • P47 is extant and reads a ὅσιος form.
  • 2436 retains its uncertainty/damage qualification; 2076* and 2076C are states of one artifact.

Evidence notes

Important distinctions in the evidence.

  • The future-tense title is textually secure at Revelation 1:4, 1:8, and 4:8.
  • Beza’s Greek wording first appeared in his 1582 third edition and was later received into the Textus Receptus tradition.
  • Beza referred to an old manuscript, but no presently identifiable Greek witness can be connected to that report.
  • Beatus and the Ethiopic tradition are versional or commentary evidence, not surviving Greek manuscripts.
  • P47 is extant and reads a ὅσιος form.
  • 2436 retains its uncertainty/damage qualification; 2076* and 2076C are states of one artifact.

Evidence assessment

Why the KJV reading is retained

ECM treats the title as one complex unit. None of its Greek manuscript entries reads either κύριε or ἐσόμενος. The 91 displayed Greek states, representing 90 physical artifacts, preserve several forms centered on ὅσιος.

Primary support for the KJV reading

Historical printed-text and manuscript-report evidence rather than extant Greek manuscript support

Evidence represented on this page

Evidence types, without turning rows into votes.

GreekRepresented
LatinRepresented
Other versionsRepresented
FathersRepresented
Printed editionsRepresented

Separate evidence category

Printed editions and reception history

Printed editions are presented apart from handwritten manuscripts and ancient versions. Edition-group summaries appear first; named supporting and competing editions then follow chronologically.

Edition evidence for both readings

Catalogued records

5

Named / aggregate

4 / 1

Date span

AD 1516–1657

Tradition conclusions appear first. Named manuscripts and other identifiable witnesses follow from oldest to newest with their dates and passage-specific readings.

WitnessDate rangeNotes

Earlier Textus Receptus editions

Textual unitκαὶ ὁ ἐσόμενος (“and the one who shall be”) versus forms of ὁ ὅσιος (“the Holy One”)

Aggregate / traditionEdition groupCompeting witness
AD 1516–1551

Print καὶ ὁ ὅσιος rather than Beza's later future-tense form.

Beza's third Greek edition

Textual unitκαὶ ὁ ἐσόμενος (“and the one who shall be”)

Named witnessPrinted edition
AD 1582

Prints καὶ ὁ ἐσόμενος, the exact future-tense Greek form represented by the KJV.

Clementine Vulgate

Textual unitκύριε (“O Lord”), which is absent from all Greek manuscripts in Palmer's apparatus.

Named witnessPrinted edition
AD 1592

The 1592 printed Vulgate includes “Lord.”

Ethiopic text in Walton's London Polyglot

Textual unitκύριε (“O Lord”), which is absent from all Greek manuscripts in Palmer's apparatus.

Named witnessPrinted edition
AD 1657

Walton's 1657 printed Ethiopic text includes “Lord”; it is not an ancient Ethiopic manuscript.

Ethiopic text in Walton's London Polyglot

Textual unitκαὶ ὁ ἐσόμενος (“and the one who shall be”) versus forms of ὁ ὅσιος (“the Holy One”).

Named witnessPrinted edition
AD 1657

Has a future-tense form (“who are and will be”); it is related to the KJV future, but not identical to the full TR wording.

References

Editions and works cited.

  1. Palmer, David Robert. The Revelation of John: The Ancient Greek Text, Alternating Verse by Verse with a New English Translation from the Greek. 2026 ed.

  2. Hoskier, Herman C. Concerning the Text of the Apocalypse: Collations of All Existing Available Greek Documents with the Standard Text of Stephen’s Third Edition, Together with the Testimony of Versions, Commentaries and Fathers. 2 vols. London: Bernard Quaritch, 1929.

  3. Krans, Jan. Beyond What Is Written: Erasmus and Beza as Conjectural Critics of the New Testament. New Testament Tools, Studies and Documents 35. Leiden: Brill, 2006.

  4. INTF digital Editio Critica Maior: Revelation. Revelation 16:5.

  5. INTF Kurzgefasste Liste / NTVMR manuscript metadata

Revelation 16:5: Which Art, and Wast, and Shalt Be | Oldest & Best