Browse contested readings like an evidence database.

The paper presents the doxology as overwhelmingly supported in Greek manuscripts, with notable early Greek, Latin, and Coptic omission witnesses.

The paper states that only ten of about 1,700 surviving Greek manuscripts of Matthew omit the verse.

The paper presents Matthew 18:11 as a vast-majority case, supported by 1,500+ Greek manuscripts and opposed by fewer than 30 principal Greek witnesses.

The paper describes Matthew 23:14 as supported by a strong Greek majority, Syriac support, and patristic support from Hilary and Chrysostom.

The paper lists 1,500+ Greek manuscripts supporting Mark 7:16, with fewer than 20 principal Greek witnesses against.

The paper presents Mark 9:44 and 9:46 as supported by 1,500+ Greek manuscripts and opposed by fewer than 30 principal Greek witnesses.

The paper cites J. K. Elliott as maintaining that the TR and over 95 percent of Greek manuscripts of Mark have the original reading.

The paper calls Mark 15:28 a large-majority case, with strong named early evidence against it.

The paper presents Mark 16:9-20 as a count-first case: 1,653 Greek manuscripts include it while three Greek manuscripts end at 16:8.

The paper lists Luke 23:17 as a vast-majority reading with 1,500+ Greek manuscripts supporting and fewer than 20 principal Greek witnesses against.

The paper explicitly labels Luke 23:34 as not a scant-evidence-against case: support is strong, but early omission evidence is substantial.

The paper reports over 1,400 later Byzantine manuscripts, roughly 95 percent of extant Greek copies of John, supporting the longer reading.

The paper lists 1,495 Greek manuscripts and 495 lectionaries supporting the passage in whole or in part, while noting strong early Greek omission evidence.

The paper is careful here: Acts 8:37 has about 10 to 12 principal Greek witnesses, while the majority of Greek manuscripts omit it.

The paper presents Acts 28:29 as supported by hundreds of Byzantine manuscripts and lectionaries but opposed by strong early Greek witnesses.

The paper presents Romans 16:24 as included by Byzantine and later witnesses, with strong early Greek support against the verse at this location.

A complex Trinitarian variant with limited Greek support but substantial Latin, printed-text, and patristic evidence listed in the source paper.